MTIC 2027. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.MTIC 2027. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Home Submisssion Publication Information

Publication Information

1. All papers will undergo double-blind peer review by 2–3 members of the Program Committee. Submissions must be original, unpublished, and not simultaneously under consideration for any other conference or journal. Plagiarism and all other forms of academic misconduct are strictly prohibited. Upon acceptance, authors are required to complete the corresponding registration and present their work in person.


2. After a rigorous review process, all accepted papers will be included in the MTIC 2027 Conference Proceedings and submitted for indexing in major databases such as EI Compendex and Scopus:


l EI Compendex

l Scopus


Peer Review (Double Blind)

1. The secretary office checks if the papers are edited in accordance with the basic publishing standard. Those who fail to meet the standard will be rejected or required to make major changes before resubmission.


2. Those pass the preliminary check will be sent for Plagiarism and salami publications check. Papers found to commit plagiarism or salami publications will be rejected directly, and the left will be sent to guest editors.


3. Guest editors will appoint 2-3 suitable TPC members / sub-reviewers to review each paper based on the reviewers’ research fields and topics of the submissions. Reviewers will be allotted 1-2 weeks to finish the review reports.


4. Guest editors make decisions (accept, accept with minor revision, accept with major revision, and reject) according to the review reports. If necessary, the guest editor will discuss with other TPC chairs in reaching the final decision.


5. Revisions (accept with minor revision and accept with major revision) should be made before the deadline and sent back for review again until meet the accept standard, and the revised articles will also be reviewed by the initial reviewers.


Reviewer Application


MTIC 2027 conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by reviewers. Reviewers are members the conference's Technical Committee of experts in fields specifically matching the conference topics.


Technical Committee members provide the vital link with the profession that makes the conference a success. The reviews help the Program Committee select which papers to accept and reject. Additionally, your reviews help the authors of papers make their papers and presentations stronger. Finally, your suggestions help the Program Chairs select the outstanding papers.


Criteria for Being a Reviewer


- Holding a doctorate in the relevant field

- Be an established expert in the field

- Having an excellent publications track record in high impact, peer-reviewed journals

- Adequate general knowledge of the sub-fields

- Past experience of reviewing abstracts/ full papers and being in editorial boards

- Fluency in language and grammar


Benefits for Being a Reviewer


- Listing as an Technical Committee member on the conference webpage and in the printed proceedings

- Eligibility for special discount for the registration fee

- Getting an electronic reviewer certificate

- Keep up to date on the researches in your field

- Opportunity to develop your career and critical thinking skills essential to research

- Bolstering of resumes for promotion and/or tenure.


The final decision regarding the selection will be made by the Technical Committee Chair. If you would like to be considered to serve on the Technical Committee, please send your latest CV to E-mail: aoagpublish@outlook.com